[2013] FWCA 7655 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
KIDS WORLD GILSTON PTY LTD
(AG2013/2646)
KIDS WORLD GILSTON - EARLY YEARS QUALITY FUND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Children’s services | |
VICE PRESIDENT CATANZARITI | SYDNEY, 2 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the KIDS WORLD GILSTON - Early Years Quality Fund Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the KIDS WORLD GILSTON - Early Years Quality Fund Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by KIDS WORLD GILSTON PTY LTD. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] United Voice, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 October 2017.
VICE PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE404510 PR542751>
- AGLC
- KIDS WORLD GILSTON PTY LTD [2013] FWCA 7655
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7655
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009, and if the necessary procedural fairness was observed in the negotiation and execution of the agreement. The court also needed to determine if the agreement was consistent with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 and if it adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining.
The court examined the negotiation process, the content of the agreement, and the representation of the employees by the AEU. It was found that the applicant had engaged in good faith bargaining and that the AEU had appropriately represented the employees. The court also noted that the agreement included provisions that were consistent with the principles of procedural fairness and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court approved the agreement, finding that it was fair and reasonable, and thus registered it under the Act. The court's decision was based on the comprehensive evidence presented and the compliance of the agreement with the relevant legislative provisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.