Kidd and Kidd (No.2)

In *Kidd and Kidd (No.2)*, heard by Judge Scarlett, the applicant sought to make an oral application, the nature of which is not specified. The proceedings involved an application filed on 1 August 2013, which was ultimately dismissed.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the applicant leave to make an oral application. Additionally, the court considered applications for extensions of time concerning previous orders made on 28 June 2013, specifically regarding compliance with an unspecified order and the filing and service of written submissions in respect of costs.

Judge Scarlett granted the applicant leave to make an oral application. The court also extended the time for compliance with an order made on 28 June 2013 by fourteen days from the date of the current order. Furthermore, the time for the applicant to file and serve written submissions on costs, as directed by a previous order, was extended by twenty-one days from the date of the current order. The application filed on 1 August 2013 was dismissed.