Khoury v Khoury

Case

[2025] NSWSC 760

17 July 2025


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Khoury v Khoury [2025] NSWSC 760 [2025] NSWSC 760 17 July 2025

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Khoury v Khoury, the High Court of Australia considered an equitable dispute arising from an informal agreement between two brothers, the plaintiffs and the defendants in the case. The brothers agreed to jointly develop a duplex on land owned by one of them. They intended to occupy the respective properties upon completion of the construction. The court was tasked with determining whether the surviving brother held the property he occupied under a common intention constructive trust for his deceased brother, in light of the informal agreement.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether a common intention constructive trust existed over the property occupied by the living brother, based on the informal agreement. This required the court to examine the nature and content of the agreement, the intentions of the parties, and whether the living brother had suffered a detriment that could give rise to a common intention constructive trust. The court also had to consider whether the deceased brother's failure to transfer title to the living brother before his death could be sufficient to establish the trust.

The court held that the living brother did hold the property on trust for his deceased brother, pursuant to their informal agreement. The court found that the agreement established a common intention that the living brother would occupy one of the lots, and that this intention was manifested in the actions of both parties. The court determined that the living brother had suffered a detriment by contributing to the construction costs and by forgoing other opportunities, which was sufficient to establish the requisite detriment for a common intention constructive trust. Consequently, the court held that the deceased brother held the property on trust for the living brother.

The final orders of the court were not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but it is reasonable to infer that the court would have ordered the deceased brother's widow to hold the property in trust for the living brother, in accordance with the terms of the informal agreement. This would ensure that the living brother's interest in the property is recognised and protected, reflecting the equitable principles underpinning the common intention constructive trust.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Property Law

  • Trusts & Equity

Legal Concepts

  • Constructive Trust

  • Common Intention Constructive Trust

  • Detriment

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

2

Khoury v Khoury (No 2) [2025] NSWSC 1193
Khoury v Khoury (No 2) [2025] NSWSC 1193
Cases Cited

4

Statutory Material Cited

1

Galati v Deans [2023] NSWCA 13
West v Mead [2003] NSWSC 161
West v Mead [2003] NSWSC 161