Kessly v Hasapaki
Case
•
[2015] NSWCA 292
•05 June 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kessly v Hasapaki [2015] NSWCA 292
[2015] NSWCA 292
05 June 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal concerned a dispute between Kessly (appellant) and Hasapaki (respondent) before Macfarlan JA of the Court of Appeal of New South Wales. The specific nature of the underlying dispute was not detailed, but the proceedings before the Court of Appeal related to an appeal from orders made by the Land and Environment Court on 15 May 2015.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether to grant the appellant leave to amend her Notice of Appeal, whether to stay certain orders of the Land and Environment Court pending the determination of the appeal, and whether to grant the respondent's application for security for her costs of the appeal.
The Court of Appeal granted the appellant leave to amend her Notice of Appeal, allowing her to file the proposed Amended Notice of Appeal. Furthermore, the Court ordered a stay of specific orders (7) to (9) made by the Land and Environment Court on 15 May 2015, which would remain in effect until the appeal was decided. The respondent's application for security for costs was dismissed. The Court made no specific orders regarding the costs of the motions filed by both parties, directing that these costs would be considered as part of the general costs of the appeal.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether to grant the appellant leave to amend her Notice of Appeal, whether to stay certain orders of the Land and Environment Court pending the determination of the appeal, and whether to grant the respondent's application for security for her costs of the appeal.
The Court of Appeal granted the appellant leave to amend her Notice of Appeal, allowing her to file the proposed Amended Notice of Appeal. Furthermore, the Court ordered a stay of specific orders (7) to (9) made by the Land and Environment Court on 15 May 2015, which would remain in effect until the appeal was decided. The respondent's application for security for costs was dismissed. The Court made no specific orders regarding the costs of the motions filed by both parties, directing that these costs would be considered as part of the general costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Kessly v Hasapaki [2015] NSWCA 292
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Grustein v Hasapaki (No 2)
[2014] NSWLEC 174
Preston v Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management Pty Ltd
[2007] NSWCA 247
Gray t/as Clarence Valley Plumbing v Ware Building Pty Ltd
[2012] NSWCA 438