Kerry Logistics (Australia) Pty Ltd

Case [2018] FWCA 1095


[2018] FWCA 1095
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Kerry Logistics (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2017/4301)

KERRY LOGISTICS (AUSTRALIA) TRANSPORT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017

Road transport industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON

MELBOURNE, 20 FEBRUARY 2018

Application for approval of the Kerry Logistics (Australia) Transport Enterprise Agreement 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Kerry Logistics (Australia) Transport Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Kerry Logistics (Australia) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 February 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 19 February 2021.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE427400  PR600566>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Kerry Logistics (Australia) Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 1095
Case
[2018] FWCA 1095
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent case of Kerry Logistics (Australia) Pty Ltd, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) was asked to consider an application for the approval of the Kerry Logistics (Australia) Transport Enterprise Agreement 2017. This matter arose as the applicant, Kerry Logistics, sought formal recognition of the agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred around the terms of the proposed enterprise agreement and whether it met the necessary criteria for approval as prescribed by the Act.

The primary legal issues before the FWC were whether the proposed agreement was a "better off overall test" (BOOT) agreement and whether it complied with the procedural requirements for approval. The BOOT test requires that the proposed agreement provides employees with outcomes that are at least as good as their current conditions, or better, in terms of wages and conditions. Additionally, the FWC needed to ensure that the necessary procedural steps, including proper consultation and the provision of relevant information to employees, had been followed in the agreement's formation.

In deliberating on these issues, the FWC examined the proposed agreement's provisions in detail, assessing whether it met the BOOT requirements. The FWC also reviewed the evidence presented regarding the consultation process and the manner in which employees were informed about the agreement. After careful consideration, the FWC concluded that the agreement satisfied the BOOT test and that all procedural requirements had been met. Consequently, the FWC approved the Kerry Logistics (Australia) Transport Enterprise Agreement 2017, affirming its compliance with the relevant statutory provisions.

The FWC's decision was grounded in a thorough analysis of the agreement's provisions and the evidence of the consultation process. By approving the agreement, the FWC recognised the negotiated terms as fair and reasonable, providing a legally binding framework for the employment relationship between Kerry Logistics and its employees. The final orders confirmed the approval of the enterprise agreement, effective from the date of the decision, thereby resolving the application brought before the Commission.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.