Kerrigan and Nott (No.2)
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 2147
•28 August 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kerrigan and Nott (No.2) [2017] FCCA 2147
[2017] FCCA 2147
28 August 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Kerrigan and Nott (No.2)*, Judge Riley of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia was required to determine the appropriate orders concerning the former matrimonial home following an application by the husband, Mr Kerrigan, for enforcement of previous orders. The dispute centred on the wife, Ms Nott's, continued occupation of the property and the husband's sole power to sell it.
The court was asked to consider whether a warrant of possession should issue to evict the wife from the former matrimonial home, and whether the husband should have the sole power to effect its sale. The court also had to determine the wife's liability for the husband's costs associated with the enforcement application.
Judge Riley ordered that a warrant of possession issue, directing Victoria Police or another enforcement officer to evict the wife from the property within seven days, with or without force, and to remove her without further reference to her. The husband was granted the sole power to effect the sale of the former matrimonial home. Existing orders from 12 April 2017 were to remain in full force. The wife was ordered to pay the husband's costs of the enforcement application, fixed at $4,595.75, to be paid from her share of the proceeds of the sale of the property.
The court was asked to consider whether a warrant of possession should issue to evict the wife from the former matrimonial home, and whether the husband should have the sole power to effect its sale. The court also had to determine the wife's liability for the husband's costs associated with the enforcement application.
Judge Riley ordered that a warrant of possession issue, directing Victoria Police or another enforcement officer to evict the wife from the property within seven days, with or without force, and to remove her without further reference to her. The husband was granted the sole power to effect the sale of the former matrimonial home. Existing orders from 12 April 2017 were to remain in full force. The wife was ordered to pay the husband's costs of the enforcement application, fixed at $4,595.75, to be paid from her share of the proceeds of the sale of the property.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
2
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty ltd
[1993] FCA 801
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11
Ellis v Silver Vision Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2017] FCCA 151