Kerr in His Capacity as trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Cross v Akcan
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1128
•19 June 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kerr in His Capacity as trustee of the Bankrupt Estate of Cross v Akcan [2017] FCCA 1128
[2017] FCCA 1128
19 June 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application by the trustee of the bankrupt estate of Cross, Mr Kerr, against Akcan. The trustee sought to recover funds transferred by Mr Cross to Akcan prior to Mr Cross's bankruptcy. The application was heard in the Federal Court of Australia.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the transfers of funds from Mr Cross to Akcan constituted voidable transactions under section 120 of the *Bankruptcy Act 1966* (Cth). Specifically, the Court had to determine if the transfers were made for less than the reasonably equivalent value, and if Mr Cross was insolvent at the time of the transfers or became insolvent as a result of them.
Judge Driver found that the transfers were indeed voidable preferences. The Court was satisfied that Mr Cross did not receive reasonably equivalent value for the significant sums transferred to Akcan. Furthermore, evidence presented indicated that Mr Cross was insolvent at the time of these transfers, or that the transfers themselves rendered him insolvent. The Court applied the principles established in bankruptcy law concerning the avoidance of transactions that deplete a bankrupt's estate to the detriment of creditors.
Consequently, the Court ordered that the funds transferred by Mr Cross to Akcan be repaid to the trustee of Mr Cross's bankrupt estate.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the transfers of funds from Mr Cross to Akcan constituted voidable transactions under section 120 of the *Bankruptcy Act 1966* (Cth). Specifically, the Court had to determine if the transfers were made for less than the reasonably equivalent value, and if Mr Cross was insolvent at the time of the transfers or became insolvent as a result of them.
Judge Driver found that the transfers were indeed voidable preferences. The Court was satisfied that Mr Cross did not receive reasonably equivalent value for the significant sums transferred to Akcan. Furthermore, evidence presented indicated that Mr Cross was insolvent at the time of these transfers, or that the transfers themselves rendered him insolvent. The Court applied the principles established in bankruptcy law concerning the avoidance of transactions that deplete a bankrupt's estate to the detriment of creditors.
Consequently, the Court ordered that the funds transferred by Mr Cross to Akcan be repaid to the trustee of Mr Cross's bankrupt estate.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Insolvency
-
Civil Procedure
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Fiduciary Duty
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Nugawela (No 2) [2017] FCCA 1999
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Cutts (No.3)
[2017] FCCA 2762
Lavan Legal v Kenyon
[2017] FCCA 2529
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Nugawela (No 2)
[2017] FCCA 1999
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
5
Kerr (Trustee), in the matter of Cross (Bankrupt) v Bechara
[2015] FCA 284
Zdrilic v Hickie
[2016] FCAFC 101