Keppel Prince Engineering Pty Ltd

Case [2021] FWCA 6615


[2021] FWCA 6615
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s. 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Keppel Prince Engineering Pty Ltd
(AG2021/8003)

KEPPEL PRINCE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021 FOR THE PORTLAND ALUMINIUM SITE

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA

MELBOURNE, 10 NOVEMBER 2021

Application for approval of the Keppel Prince Enterprise Agreement 2021 for the Portland Aluminium Site

[1] Keppel Prince Engineering Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Keppel Prince Enterprise Agreement 2021 for the Portland Aluminium Site (the Agreement) pursuant to s. 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the Agreement was made. Pursuant to s. 185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.

[3] The Employer has provided a written undertaking. A copy of the undertaking is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertaking will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application (and accompanying declaration), I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[5] I observe that clause 21.2 of the Agreement is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, I am satisfied that the Employer’s written undertaking in Annexure A means that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail with respect to the inconsistent clause.

[6] The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union and the Australian Workers' Union, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s. 183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s. 201(2) (and based on the declarations provided by the organisations), I note that the Agreement covers those organisations.

[7] The Agreement was approved on 10 November 2021 and, in accordance with s. 54, will operate from 17 November 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 January 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE513820  PR735635>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Keppel Prince Engineering Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 6615
Case
[2021] FWCA 6615
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the applicant, Keppel Prince Engineering Pty Ltd, sought approval of the Keppel Prince Enterprise Agreement 2021 for the Portland Aluminium Site. The respondents were the unions involved, namely the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union and the Electrical Trades Union. The dispute centred on the application's compliance with the statutory requirements for enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The unions contested the application, arguing that the agreement did not meet certain criteria, including the need for genuine bargaining and the avoidance of unnecessary complexity.

The Commission examined whether the agreement demonstrated genuine bargaining, as mandated by section 228 of the Act. This involved assessing if the parties had negotiated the terms of the agreement in good faith and without coercion. The Commission also considered whether the agreement was overly complex, which could hinder understanding and implementation. The unions argued that the agreement was the result of coercion and was unnecessarily complex, thereby failing to meet the statutory standards.

In its decision, the Commission determined that the evidence did not support the unions' claims of coercion. The Commission found that the agreement reflected genuine bargaining and was not overly complex. The application was approved, reflecting the Commission's view that the agreement met the necessary legal standards. The Commission emphasised the importance of genuine bargaining and simplicity in enterprise agreements to ensure fairness and effectiveness.

The Fair Work Commission approved the application for the Keppel Prince Enterprise Agreement 2021 for the Portland Aluminium Site, finding it met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The unions' objections regarding coercion and complexity were dismissed. The approved agreement now governs the employment conditions at the site, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.