Kennett v Industrial Court of NSW
Case
•
[2010] NSWCA 307
•17 November 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kennett v Industrial Court of NSW [2010] NSWCA 307
[2010] NSWCA 307
17 November 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of New South Wales, constituted by Allsop P, Young JA, and Handley AJA, considered an application for supervisory relief brought by Kennett against the Industrial Court of NSW. The dispute concerned an order for costs made by the Full Bench of the Industrial Court.
The primary legal issue before the Supreme Court was whether the Full Bench of the Industrial Court had committed a jurisdictional error in making the costs order. This involved an examination of the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under section 69 of the *Supreme Court Act 1970* (NSW) and the relevant provisions of the *Industrial Relations Act 1996* (NSW), particularly section 191, and the *Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996*, specifically rule 209, which deals with costs.
The Court reasoned that the Full Bench of the Industrial Court had not erred in its jurisdiction. The illness of counsel, which led to costs being thrown away, was a matter within the discretion of the Industrial Court to consider when making an order for costs. The Supreme Court found no basis to interfere with this exercise of discretion, as no jurisdictional error had been demonstrated.
The summons was dismissed, and Kennett was ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
The primary legal issue before the Supreme Court was whether the Full Bench of the Industrial Court had committed a jurisdictional error in making the costs order. This involved an examination of the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under section 69 of the *Supreme Court Act 1970* (NSW) and the relevant provisions of the *Industrial Relations Act 1996* (NSW), particularly section 191, and the *Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996*, specifically rule 209, which deals with costs.
The Court reasoned that the Full Bench of the Industrial Court had not erred in its jurisdiction. The illness of counsel, which led to costs being thrown away, was a matter within the discretion of the Industrial Court to consider when making an order for costs. The Supreme Court found no basis to interfere with this exercise of discretion, as no jurisdictional error had been demonstrated.
The summons was dismissed, and Kennett was ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Employment Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Mallegowda v Sood (No 3) [2015] NSWDC 14
Cases Citing This Decision
5
Dominello v Harbour Radio Pty Limited t/as 2GB
[2019] NSWSC 403
Chel v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd
[2015] NSWSC 171
Hall v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd
[2014] NSWSC 1604
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
4
Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd
[1950] HCA 35
Coulton v Holcombe
[1986] HCA 33
Lemoto v Able Technical Pty Ltd
[2005] NSWCA 153