Kennards Self Storage Pty Ltd v Valuer-General
Case
•
[2023] QLC 3
•13 March 2023
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kennards Self Storage Pty Ltd v Valuer-General [2023] QLC 3
[2023] QLC 3
13 March 2023
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Kennards Self Storage Pty Ltd, the appellant, challenged the valuation of land conducted by the Valuer-General, the respondent, before the Land Court. The appellant sought an order for disclosure of calculations used by the Valuer-General and argued that the original valuation was relevant in the appeal before the Land Court. The court had to determine whether the application for disclosure should be granted before the pleadings and whether a valuation appeal before the Land Court under the Land Valuation Act 2010 was a hearing de novo.
The court held that the application for disclosure should not be granted before the pleadings. The court reasoned that the disclosure of calculations used by the Valuer-General would be premature at this stage and could potentially prejudice the proceedings. The court also found that a valuation appeal before the Land Court was not a hearing de novo, and therefore, the original valuation was not relevant in the appeal. The court held that the appellant's contention was misconceived.
The court dismissed the application for disclosure and ordered that any submissions seeking a costs order in this proceeding must be filed and served within 14 days of the publication of these reasons. The court did not make any orders for costs in this proceeding. The decision of the Land Court was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
The court held that the application for disclosure should not be granted before the pleadings. The court reasoned that the disclosure of calculations used by the Valuer-General would be premature at this stage and could potentially prejudice the proceedings. The court also found that a valuation appeal before the Land Court was not a hearing de novo, and therefore, the original valuation was not relevant in the appeal. The court held that the appellant's contention was misconceived.
The court dismissed the application for disclosure and ordered that any submissions seeking a costs order in this proceeding must be filed and served within 14 days of the publication of these reasons. The court did not make any orders for costs in this proceeding. The decision of the Land Court was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Limitation Periods
-
Discovery & Disclosure
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Marasol Pty Ltd v Philips [2025] FCA 945
Cases Citing This Decision
138
Golden Harvest (Aust) P/L v Paing P/L
[2004] NSWCA 85
Crand & Ors and Crand & Ors
[2018] FamCA 631
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
3
F A Pidgeon & Son Pty Ltd v Valuer-General; 310 Ann Street Nominees Pty Ltd v Valuer-General (No 2)
[2019] QLC 25
ISPT Pty Ltd v Valuer-General (No 2)
[2019] QLC 31
Aldrich v Ross
[2000] QCA 501