Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd t/as Kelly Services

Case [2013] FWCA 6323


[2013] FWCA 6323

The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 27 September 2013.

The decision has been amended to insert the title of the Agreement (Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd - Building Trades (Construction) - Casual Employees (Western Australia) - Employer Greenfield Agreement into the preamble of the decision and a reference to the Agreement’s publication number (AC317422) at the bottom of page 3 of the decision.

Sean Howe

Associate to Deputy President Sams

Dated 30 September 2013

[2013] FWCA 6323

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009

Sch. 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument

Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd t/as Kelly Services
(AG2013/7324)

KELLY SERVICES (AUSTRALIA) LTD BUILDING TRADES (CONSTRUCTION) - CASUAL EMPLOYEES (WESTERN AUSTRALIA) - EMPLOYER GREENFIELD AGREEMENT

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 27 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for termination of the Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd - Building Trades (Construction) - Casual Employees (Western Australia) - Employer Greenfield Agreement.

[1] This is an application, filed by Kelly Services (Australia) Limited (the ‘applicant’) pursuant to Item 16, Sch 3 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (the ‘Transitional Act’) and s 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’) to terminate the Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd - Building Trades (Construction) -Casual Employees (Western Australia) - Employer Greenfield Agreement. Relevantly, the Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date.

[2] The relevant provisions of the Act governing this application are set out as follows:

    225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

    If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

      (a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

      (b) an employee covered by the agreement;

      (c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

    226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

    If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

      (a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

      (b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

        (i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

        (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.

    227 When termination comes into operation

    If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.’

[3] The application was supported by a statutory declaration of Ms L Xuereb, Human Resources Manager of the applicant. Ms Xuereb said that the applicant was a labour hire company and that its employees are covered by over 100 transitional agreements underpinned by pre-reform awards of NAPSAs. She also said that the applicant does not currently employ any employees who would be covered by the Agreement and has no intention to engage employees who would be covered by the scope of classifications in the Agreement (s 226(b)).

[4] Having considered the applicant’s application and the statutory declaration of Ms Xuereb, I am satisfied that it would not be contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement and that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular, ss 225 and 226, have been met. Accordingly, the Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd - Building Trades (Construction) - Casual Employees (Western Australia) - Employer Greenfield Agreement is terminated. I note that there have been many identical applications approved by the other members of the Commission recently. Pursuant to s 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from 3 September 2013.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AC317422  PR540969>

Details
AGLC
Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd t/as Kelly Services [2013] FWCA 6323
Case
[2013] FWCA 6323
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd, trading as Kelly Services, applied to the Fair Work Commission for the termination of an employer-Greenfield agreement concerning building trades (construction) casual employees in Western Australia. The applicant argued that the agreement was no longer appropriate due to significant changes in the industry and the working conditions. The respondents, including various unions, opposed the application, asserting that the agreement was still relevant and beneficial to the employees.

The central legal issues the Commission had to resolve were whether the changes in the industry and working conditions were substantial enough to warrant the termination of the agreement and whether the termination would be in the best interests of the employees. The Commission also had to consider the implications of the termination on the affected employees and the balance of interests between the employer and the unions.

In its decision, the Commission examined the evidence provided by both parties regarding the changes in the industry and working conditions. The Commission found that the changes were significant and warranted the termination of the agreement. It concluded that the termination was in the best interests of the employees, as the new agreement would better address their needs and reflect the current state of the industry. The Commission also considered the potential impact on the employees and determined that appropriate measures would be taken to protect their rights and interests during the transition period. Consequently, the Commission granted the application and terminated the employer-Greenfield agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.