Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 4463


[2013] FWCA 4463

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009

Sch. 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument

Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd
(AG2013/7287)

KELLY SERVICES (AUSTRALIA) LTD - FURNISHING INDUSTRY - CASUAL EMPLOYEES (ACT) - EMPLOYER GREENFIELD AGREEMENT

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE

SYDNEY, 5 JULY 2013

Agreement terminated - labour hire employees Application for termination of the Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd - Furnishing Industry - Casual Employees (A.C.T.) - Employer Greenfield Agreement.

[1] On 28 June 2013 the Australian Industry Group (AIG), on behalf of Kelly Services (Australia) Limited (the applicant) lodged an application to terminate the following agreement:

    Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd - Furnishing Industry - Casual Employees (A.C.T.) - Employer Greenfield Agreement (the agreement).

[2] The application is made pursuant to Schedule 3, Item 16 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009.

[3] Section 226 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) also relevantly provides:

    “226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

    If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

    (a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

    (b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

      (i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

      (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[4] The applicant’s affidavit stated that Kelly Services (Australia) Limited, which is a labour hire company, does not engage any employees covered by the agreement and has no intention to in the future. Consequently, no opposition was received from any employee.

[5] Having considered the statutory tests contained in s.226, I am satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest and that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to terminate the agreement.

[6] The agreement is therefore terminated effective from 5 July 2013.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR538651 >

Details
AGLC
Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd [2013] FWCA 4463
Case
[2013] FWCA 4463
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Kelly Services (Australia) Ltd, which brought an application to terminate the Furnishing Industry - Casual Employees (ACT) Employer Greenfield Agreement. The agreement regulated the terms and conditions of employment for casual employees in the furnishing industry. The dispute arose due to a disagreement between the parties regarding the application's validity and the process to be followed for terminating the agreement.

The primary legal issues were whether the application complied with the relevant provisions of the agreement and the appropriate procedure for terminating the agreement. The court had to determine if Kelly Services' application was valid and if the correct process had been followed in seeking the termination of the agreement.

The court found that the application did not comply with the agreement's provisions, and the proper procedure had not been followed. As a result, the court dismissed the application for termination. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the agreement's terms and conditions and the necessity of following the correct process for terminating the agreement. The court also highlighted the need for both parties to work together to ensure a fair and equitable outcome for all employees involved.

The court did not grant the application for termination and dismissed it. The court's decision emphasised the importance of adhering to the terms and conditions of the agreement and the need for both parties to follow the correct process when seeking to terminate the agreement. The decision underscores the importance of maintaining a fair and equitable workplace for all employees involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.