Kelly and Hughes
Case
•
[2019] FamCA 621
•4 September 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kelly and Hughes [2019] FamCA 621
[2019] FamCA 621
4 September 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Kelly and Hughes*, heard by Cleary J, the proceedings concerned applications made by the mother. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond the mother's applications, is not detailed in the provided text.
The court was required to determine the applications filed by the mother on 24 July 2019 and 8 August 2019. The former was an Application in a Case (stay), and the latter was an Application in a Case (review).
Cleary J dismissed both applications. The reasoning behind this dismissal is not elaborated upon in the provided text, nor are the specific legal principles that guided the court's decision.
The final orders of the court were that the mother's Application in a Case (stay) filed on 24 July 2019 and her Application in a Case (review) filed on 8 August 2019 be dismissed, subject to the formal entry of these orders in the Court's records.
The court was required to determine the applications filed by the mother on 24 July 2019 and 8 August 2019. The former was an Application in a Case (stay), and the latter was an Application in a Case (review).
Cleary J dismissed both applications. The reasoning behind this dismissal is not elaborated upon in the provided text, nor are the specific legal principles that guided the court's decision.
The final orders of the court were that the mother's Application in a Case (stay) filed on 24 July 2019 and her Application in a Case (review) filed on 8 August 2019 be dismissed, subject to the formal entry of these orders in the Court's records.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Kelly and Hughes [2019] FamCA 621
Most Recent Citation
Re L H Holding Management Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 407
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Aldridge & Keaton (Stay Appeal)
[2009] FamCAFC 106
Trahn & Long (No. 2)
[2008] FamCAFC 194
Aldridge & Keaton (Stay Appeal)
[2009] FamCAFC 106