| [2019] FWCA 6735 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Kelbon Project Services Pty Ltd
(AG2019/2519)
KELBON PROJECT SERVICES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 30 SEPTEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Kelbon Project Services Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as Kelbon Project Services Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Kelbon Project Services Pty Ltd.
[2] The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Appendix A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss. 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE505497 PR712865>
Appendix A.
- AGLC
- Kelbon Project Services Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 6735
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 6735
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, particularly in terms of procedural fairness, and whether it contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions. The employer argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable, while the union contended that certain provisions were not in compliance with the Act.
The Commission examined the provisions of the agreement and found that while most of the agreement was in line with the Fair Work Act, certain provisions relating to the classification of employees did not meet the mandated minimum terms and conditions. The Commission held that these provisions were not fair and reasonable and therefore could not be approved. Consequently, the application for approval of the enterprise agreement was dismissed in part. The Commission directed that the employer and the union must negotiate in good faith to address the deficiencies identified in the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.