Keehan and Keehan

Case

[2018] FamCAFC 79

19 April 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Keehan and Keehan [2018] FamCAFC 79 [2018] FamCAFC 79 19 April 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Keehan and Keehan involved a dispute between two parties before the Family Court of Australia. The nature of the dispute revolved around the interpretation and application of certain orders made by Judge L. Turner on 14 February 2018. The applicant sought to appeal these orders, but the court required them to file an amended notice of appeal that specifically confined the appeal to particular paragraphs of the orders.

The legal issues before the court were centered on the proper scope and form of the appeal. The court had to determine whether the applicant’s initial notice of appeal was sufficient or if it needed to be amended to comply with the court’s requirements. Additionally, the court had to consider the merits of expediting the appeal and the costs associated with the application.

In its reasoning, the court found that the initial notice of appeal was not sufficiently precise regarding the grounds of appeal. The court instructed the applicant to file an amended notice of appeal, focusing only on specific paragraphs of the contested orders. Upon the filing of the amended notice, the court agreed to allow the application for expedition of the appeal. The court also ruled that each party should bear their own costs associated with the application for expedition.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation & Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Jurisdiction

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
DICKENS & CAREY [2018] FamCAFC 135

Cases Citing This Decision

4

Keehan & Keehan (No. 2) [2018] FamCAFC 139
DICKENS & CAREY [2018] FamCAFC 135
Keehan & Keehan (No. 2) [2018] FamCAFC 139
Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

2