Katsoulas v Kritikakis; Katsoulas v Apostolatos (No 2)

In the case of Katsoulas v Kritikakis; Katsoulas v Apostolatos (No 2), the appellant sought to determine the quantification of amounts for which the defendants were to account to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's action related to a contract for the sale of property and subsequent litigation between the parties. The defendants were ordered to account to the plaintiff for moneys received by them that belonged to the plaintiff. The defendants argued that the orders for them to account to the plaintiff for those moneys were final and complete, and no other orders were necessary or appropriate. The plaintiff argued that the orders were inadequate as they did not provide for the quantification of the amounts for which the defendants were to account.

The court was required to decide whether the orders for the defendants to account to the plaintiff for the moneys they received were final and complete, or whether other orders were necessary or appropriate. The court considered the nature of the orders and the purpose of the orders for the defendants to account. The court found that the orders for the defendants to account to the plaintiff for the moneys they received were not final and complete, and that other orders were necessary or appropriate to quantify the amounts for which the defendants were to account.

The court held that the orders for the defendants to account to the plaintiff for the moneys they received were interlocutory and did not determine the amount of the moneys. The court held that the orders were not final and complete, and that other orders were necessary or appropriate to quantify the amounts for which the defendants were to account. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to an order quantifying the amounts for which the defendants were to account. The court found that the amount to be accounted for was $55,000.

The court ordered that the defendants were to pay the plaintiff the sum of $55,000, together with interest at the rate of 4% per annum from the date of judgment until the date of payment. The court also ordered that the defendants were to pay the plaintiff's costs of the appeal, to be taxed if not agreed.