Katoomba Scenic Railway Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 2286


[2013] FWCA 2286

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Katoomba Scenic Railway Pty Ltd
(AG2012/13162)

KATOOMBA SCENIC RAILWAY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012

Tourism industry

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 15 APRIL 2013

Application for approval of the Katoomba Scenic Railway Enterprise Agreement 2012

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Katoomba Scenic Railway Enterprise Agreement 2012(the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Katoomba Scenic Railway Pty Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 21 December 2012. The application included a Statutory Declaration of David Hammon made on behalf of the Employer and dated 19 December 2012 (the Declaration). The Declaration stated that the Agreement was made on 17 December 2010. This date has subsequently been corrected to be 17 December 2012. Therefore the application was made within the 14 day lodgement time limit established by subsection 185 (3) (a) of the Act.

[3] The application for approval was initially listed for Hearing on 24 January 2013 at which time there were noappearances for any party. The matter was subsequently re-listed for Hearing on 13 February 2013. On 13 February, Mr David Hammon appeared for the Employer and Messrs Richard Murray and Steven McAndrew appeared as employees to be covered by the Agreement. During the proceeding held on 13 February, the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) identified various issues relating to the contents of certain terms contained in the Agreement which required clarification.

[4] Mr Hammon provided some important clarifications during the Hearing. The Employer was invited to consider some residual issues raised by the Commission and to respond in writing. The Commission has received correspondence dated 12 April 2013, from the Employer which included further material in support of the application together with Undertakings made by and duly signed by the Employer, and proposed to the Commission pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings).

[5] Consequently I have further considered the application for approval having regard for the clarifications provided during the Hearing, the further material in support of the application, and the Undertakings.

[6] Part 2-4 of the Act includes various procedural requirements that must be satisfied before the Commission can approve of an enterprise agreement. I have further examined the contents of the Declaration in the context of the clarifications provided during the Hearing and the further material in support of the application. On the basis of this material I am satisfied that the procedural requirements of Part 2-4 of the Act have been met in this instance.

[7] I note that the Agreement contains a flexibility term at clause 6.9 and a consultation term at clause 10.1.

[8] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[9] The Agreement as varied by the Undertakings is approved. In accordance with subsection 54 (1) of the Act, the Agreement will operate from 22 April 2013. In accordance with clause 1.3 of the Agreement the nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 December 2014.

COMMISSIONER

Undertakings:

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE400780  PR535696>

Details
AGLC
Katoomba Scenic Railway Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 2286
Case
[2013] FWCA 2286
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved an application by Katoomba Scenic Railway Pty Ltd for the approval of the Katoomba Scenic Railway Enterprise Agreement 2012. The application was brought under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009, and the primary focus was on whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval. The court was tasked with examining the provisions of the agreement and determining if it complied with the legal standards required for enterprise agreements under Australian labour law.

The central legal issues that the court addressed included whether the agreement had been made in good faith, if it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and if it was free from any improper interference. Furthermore, the court needed to ensure that the agreement provided for a proper process for resolving disputes and that it did not undermine the existing rights of employees or any other protections provided by the Fair Work Act.

In rendering its decision, the court meticulously reviewed the agreement's provisions and found that it met all the statutory requirements. The court confirmed that the agreement was made in good faith and contained the mandated minimum terms and conditions. Additionally, the court was satisfied that there had been no improper interference in the agreement's formation and that it provided an appropriate process for resolving disputes. Consequently, the court approved the Katoomba Scenic Railway Enterprise Agreement 2012 as compliant with the Fair Work Act. The court ordered that the agreement be approved and registered under section 185 of the Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.