Karinya Young Women's Service Inc.

Case [2018] FWCA 3296


[2018] FWCA 3296
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Karinya Young Women's Service Inc.
(AG2018/274)

KARINYA YOUNG WOMEN'S SERVICE CRISIS ACCOMMODATION EMPLOYEE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017

Tasmania

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 6 JUNE 2018

Application for approval of the Karinya Young Women's Service Crisis Accommodation Employee Enterprise Agreement 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Karinya Young Women’s Service Crisis Accommodation Employee Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Karinya Young Women’s Service Inc.. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] I note the following provisions are inconsistent with the National Employment Standards;

  Clause 7 which states that probationary employees may be terminated with 1 hours’ notice.

  Clause 9(d) which provides for termination of intermittent employees, that is any person whose period of employment exceeds 5 consecutive days. These employees employment is terminable by the employer in accordance with the employer’s requirements.

  Clause 25 which offers 2 weeks’ redundancy pay for each completed year of service.

Given the National Employment Standards precedence clause at Clause 30 of the agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 13 June 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 June 2022.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE428705  PR607860>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Karinya Young Women's Service Inc. [2018] FWCA 3296
Case
[2018] FWCA 3296
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application by Karinya Young Women's Service Inc. for the approval of the Karinya Young Women's Service Crisis Accommodation Employee Enterprise Agreement 2017. The application was heard by the Fair Work Commission, the body responsible for regulating and approving such agreements in Australia. The dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement met the necessary legal criteria for approval, including its alignment with relevant industrial instruments and compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues before the Commission involved scrutinising the agreement to ensure it satisfied the requirements of the Fair Work Act, specifically sections 231 and 232. The Commission needed to assess if the agreement was appropriate for the employees it covered, whether it contained necessary provisions for the protection of employees, and if it was free from any unfair content. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the employer and the employees or their representatives.

The Commission determined that the agreement was appropriate and contained all necessary provisions, including those for the protection of employees. It found that the agreement was fairly negotiated and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission approved the agreement, acknowledging its alignment with relevant industrial instruments and its provision of fair and reasonable terms for the employees involved.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Karinya Young Women's Service Crisis Accommodation Employee Enterprise Agreement 2017, finding it met all necessary legal criteria. The Commission's decision was based on its determination that the agreement was appropriate, contained necessary provisions, and was fairly negotiated. The approval of the agreement was made under the Fair Work Act 2009, ensuring it would provide fair and reasonable terms for the employees involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.