Karijini Rail Pty Limited
Case
•
[2019] FWC 2907
•30 APRIL 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Karijini Rail Pty Limited [2019] FWC 2907
[2019] FWC 2907
30 APRIL 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants, the Fair Work Commission (FWC), sought approval of the Karijini Rail Pty Ltd Rail Operations Pilbara Enterprise Agreement 2018. The applicants argued the agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 for genuine agreement and was an appropriate instrument to achieve the purposes of the Act. The respondents, the Australian Rail and Maritime Transport Officers Union and the Rail, Tram and Bus Union, contested the application on various grounds, including that the agreement was not genuinely agreed upon. The case was heard in the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission.
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement was genuinely agreed upon by the parties, as required by section 180(5) of the Act, and whether the agreement met the criteria under section 188(1)(c) of the Act. The respondents argued that the agreement was not genuinely agreed upon due to the process of consultation and negotiation, and the union's lack of capacity to enter into the agreement. The FWC had to consider the evidence provided by the parties and determine whether the agreement met the statutory requirements.
The FWC found that the agreement was genuinely agreed upon, as it was negotiated in good faith and the process of consultation and negotiation was robust. The Commission held that the evidence demonstrated that the unions had sufficient capacity to enter into the agreement. The FWC also found that the agreement met the criteria under section 188(1)(c) of the Act, as it was an appropriate instrument to achieve the purposes of the Act. The Full Bench dismissed the respondents' objections and approved the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Karijini Rail Pty Ltd Rail Operations Pilbara Enterprise Agreement 2018, finding that it was genuinely agreed upon and met the criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission dismissed the objections raised by the respondents and determined that the agreement was an appropriate instrument to achieve the purposes of the Act.
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement was genuinely agreed upon by the parties, as required by section 180(5) of the Act, and whether the agreement met the criteria under section 188(1)(c) of the Act. The respondents argued that the agreement was not genuinely agreed upon due to the process of consultation and negotiation, and the union's lack of capacity to enter into the agreement. The FWC had to consider the evidence provided by the parties and determine whether the agreement met the statutory requirements.
The FWC found that the agreement was genuinely agreed upon, as it was negotiated in good faith and the process of consultation and negotiation was robust. The Commission held that the evidence demonstrated that the unions had sufficient capacity to enter into the agreement. The FWC also found that the agreement met the criteria under section 188(1)(c) of the Act, as it was an appropriate instrument to achieve the purposes of the Act. The Full Bench dismissed the respondents' objections and approved the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Karijini Rail Pty Ltd Rail Operations Pilbara Enterprise Agreement 2018, finding that it was genuinely agreed upon and met the criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission dismissed the objections raised by the respondents and determined that the agreement was an appropriate instrument to achieve the purposes of the Act.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Collective Bargaining
-
Enterprise Agreement
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Karijini Rail Pty Limited [2021] FWC 364
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Karijini Rail Pty Limited
[2021] FWCFB 4522
CFMMEU v Karijini Rail Pty Ltd
[2020] FWCFB 958
Karijini Rail Pty Limited
[2021] FWC 364
Cases Cited
18
Statutory Material Cited
0
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS
[2013] FCAFC 114
Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd v United Voice
[2018] FCAFC 139
Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A Broadspectrum
[2017] FWC 1818