KAPPEL & CARLSSON (No.2)
Case
•
[2018] FCCA 2973
•24 October 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
KAPPEL & CARLSSON (No.2) [2018] FCCA 2973
[2018] FCCA 2973
24 October 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Family Court of Australia, His Honour Judge Wilson considered an application for costs following a substantive proceeding in which the applicant was wholly unsuccessful. The respondent had incurred considerable expense in defending the proceedings.
The court was required to determine whether rare or exceptional circumstances were a precondition to awarding costs on an indemnity basis. The court also considered the relevance of the applicant's impecuniosity to the exercise of its discretion regarding costs.
His Honour Judge Wilson determined that rare or exceptional circumstances are not a precondition for awarding costs on an indemnity basis, referencing key authorities on the matter. The court found that the applicant's impecuniosity did not preclude an award of costs on an indemnity basis. Consequently, the applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding on an indemnity basis, fixed at $26,233.90. This order was stayed until 23 November 2018.
The court was required to determine whether rare or exceptional circumstances were a precondition to awarding costs on an indemnity basis. The court also considered the relevance of the applicant's impecuniosity to the exercise of its discretion regarding costs.
His Honour Judge Wilson determined that rare or exceptional circumstances are not a precondition for awarding costs on an indemnity basis, referencing key authorities on the matter. The court found that the applicant's impecuniosity did not preclude an award of costs on an indemnity basis. Consequently, the applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding on an indemnity basis, fixed at $26,233.90. This order was stayed until 23 November 2018.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Scala and Scala (No.2) [2020] FCCA 38
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Ting v Superstop Auto Parts Pty Ltd
[2020] FCCA 963
Scala and Scala (No.2)
[2020] FCCA 38
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
J-Corp Pty Ltd v Australian Builders Labourers Federated Union of Workers (WA Branch) (No 2)
[1993] FCA 70
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty ltd
[1993] FCA 801