Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 2)
Case
•
[2017] NSWCA 14
•09 February 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 14
[2017] NSWCA 14
09 February 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The proceedings involved an application by the applicant, Mr Kamm, for leave to appeal against a decision of the State of New South Wales. The matter came before Payne JA, who was required to consider whether to grant the applicant an extension of time to file various documents, including amended submissions, proposed fresh evidence, and the White Books as required by the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW). The court also had to address issues concerning the issuance of subpoenas and the production of documents.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether to grant the applicant an extension of time to comply with procedural requirements for filing his appeal documents, and how to manage any disputes relating to document production, including subpoenas. The court also needed to determine the timetable for the filing of submissions and evidence by both parties and to set a date for the hearing of the appeal.
Payne JA made orders granting the applicant leave to file additional submissions, proposed fresh evidence, and the White Books by a specified date, with the consequence that the proceedings would be dismissed and the applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs in the event of non-compliance. Liberty was granted to apply to the Associate for directions. The court also ordered that any disputes concerning document production, including any subpoena, be returnable before Payne JA. Further orders set a hearing date for the appeal and established strict deadlines for the filing of written submissions and evidence by both the respondent and the applicant.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether to grant the applicant an extension of time to comply with procedural requirements for filing his appeal documents, and how to manage any disputes relating to document production, including subpoenas. The court also needed to determine the timetable for the filing of submissions and evidence by both parties and to set a date for the hearing of the appeal.
Payne JA made orders granting the applicant leave to file additional submissions, proposed fresh evidence, and the White Books by a specified date, with the consequence that the proceedings would be dismissed and the applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs in the event of non-compliance. Liberty was granted to apply to the Associate for directions. The court also ordered that any disputes concerning document production, including any subpoena, be returnable before Payne JA. Further orders set a hearing date for the appeal and established strict deadlines for the filing of written submissions and evidence by both the respondent and the applicant.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Discovery
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 3) [2017] NSWCA 68
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Spata v Tumino
[2018] NSWCA 17
Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 4)
[2017] NSWCA 189
Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 3)
[2017] NSWCA 68
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
1
Bar-Mordecai v Rotman
[2000] NSWCA 123
Neale v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
[2014] NSWCA 443
Hobbs v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2013] NSWCA 205