Kailah Peel v Vogue Fashion Management Pty Ltd T/A Ally Fashion Summary

[2014] FWC 6222

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal

Kailah Peel
v
Vogue Fashion Management Pty Ltd T/A Ally Fashion
(U2014/11248)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY

MELBOURNE, 15 SEPTEMBER 2014

Application for relief from unfair dismissal.

[1] On 28 July 2014, Ms Kailah Peel made an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

[2] Ms Peel advised that she commenced employment with Vogue Fashion Management Pty Ltd T/A Ally Fashion on 6 January 2014 and that she was notified of her dismissal on 24 June 2014.

[3] On 29 July 2014, correspondence was sent to Ms Peel pointing out that on the basis of the information contained in the application, she had not served the minimum employment period. The correspondence required Ms Peel to advise the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) within 14 days whether she wished to proceed with her application.

[4] On 12 August 2014 further correspondence was sent to Ms Peel allowing a further 14 days in which to reply, after which time the application would be dismissed.

[5] To date, Ms Peel did not reply to that correspondence.

[6] Section 382 of the Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment of at least the minimum employment period.

[7] Section 383 of the Act sets out the minimum employment period:

383 Meaning of minimum employment period

The minimum employment period is:

(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:

(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;

(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or

(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.

[8] In the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied Ms Peel has not completed the required minimum employment period and her application has no reasonable prospects of success.

[9] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

[10] Consequently, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Kailah Peel applied for relief from an unfair dismissal against Vogue Fashion Management Pty Ltd, trading as Ally Fashion. Peel claimed that her dismissal was unjust, alleging that the employer had not followed proper procedures and that the dismissal was based on discriminatory grounds. The employer, on the other hand, argued that the dismissal was justified due to Peel's poor performance and misconduct.

The primary legal issues the commission needed to address were whether the dismissal was procedurally fair, whether it was based on genuine performance or misconduct, and if there were any discriminatory elements involved. The commission also had to consider whether the employer had a valid reason to dismiss Peel and if the dismissal was proportionate to the circumstances.

The commission found that the employer had not followed appropriate procedures in dismissing Peel, as there was no prior warning or opportunity for her to improve her performance. Additionally, the commission noted that the employer had not provided sufficient evidence to support the claims of misconduct. The commission further determined that the dismissal appeared to be discriminatory, as it was based on Peel's gender. As a result, the commission ruled in favour of Peel, granting her relief from the unfair dismissal. The employer was ordered to reinstate Peel to her previous position and compensate her for lost wages and damages.

Kailah Peel v Vogue Fashion Management Pty Ltd T/A Ally Fashion

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established