| [2021] FWCA 5936 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
K&S Freighters
(AG2021/6884)
PORT KEMBLA WORKSHOP EMPLOYEES AGREEMENT 2021
Road transport industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON | SYDNEY, 22 SEPTEMBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the Port Kembla Workshop Employees Agreement 2021.
[1] K&S Freighters (the Employer) has made an application for the approval of the Port Kembla Workshop Employees Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made under s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings, a copy of which are attached as Annexure A to this decision. The undertakings can be accepted under s.190 of the Act because I am satisfied that they will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement pursuant to s.191 of the Act.
[3] Subject to the Employer’s undertakings, I am satisfied that each relevant requirement in sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act has been met.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) was a bargaining representative for the Agreement and has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the AWU.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 29 September 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 December 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE513198 PR734200>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- K&S Freighters [2021] FWCA 5936
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 5936
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and if it met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The Commission needed to assess if the agreement was procedurally sound, provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and was in the interests of the employees. The Commission also needed to determine whether any provisions in the agreement were contrary to public policy.
In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement was procedurally valid and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and provided for terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable in all respects. The Commission also found that the agreement did not contain any provisions that were contrary to public policy. The Commission approved the agreement, stating that it was in the best interests of the employees and met the statutory requirements for approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.