K R Nash & Associates Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

Case [2009] NSWLEC 1387



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: K R Nash & Associates Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 [2009] NSWLEC 1387
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
K R Nash & Associates Pty Ltd

RESPONDENT
Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
FILE NUMBER(S): 10641 of 2009
CORAM: Bly C
KEY ISSUES: CONSENT ORDERS :- Modification application; amendments to deferred commencement conditions.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000
DATES OF HEARING: 16 October 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 16 October 2009
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
Miss D Townsend (Solicitor)
SOLICITOR
Mallesons Stephen Jaques

RESPONDENT
Miss A Summerhayes (Solicitor)
SOLICITOR
Legal Services Branch
Department of Planning


JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      Bly C

      16 October 2009

      10641 of 2009 KR NASH & ASSOCIATES v MINISTER ADMINISTERING THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND ASSESSMENT ACT 1979
This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
      JUDGMENT

1 COMMISSIONER: On 25 October 2007, the Court granted a development consent for the subdivision and erection of a number of dwellings for tourist purposes at lot 41 and 42 DP 107019 Boomerang Drive, Pacific Palms. That consent was subject to a number of deferred commencement conditions that prevented the consent from operating until those matters were complied with. The applicant now seeks to modify the deferred commencement consent pursuant to s 96(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

2 The modifications are twofold. First, deferred commencement condition A1(4) is sought to be modified by omitting the reference to two years as the period for the provision of evidence in relation to the deferred commencement matters with a reference to the 25 April 2010 and effective extension of time of about six months. The second modification proposal involves the deletion of deferred commencement condition A3 that involves the dedication to the Minister for Climate Change, Environment and Water of a parcel of land described as lot B in plan A39 at attachment 3 to the conditions of consent. That deferred commencement condition is to be alternatively incorporated into the operative part of the consent in effectively the same terms, but requiring the dedication to take place prior to the issue of an occupation certificate.

3 The Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the respondent in these proceedings, does not oppose these modifications to the consent, and as a consequence the parties have provided the court with consent orders dated 17 September 2009. The modification application was not required to be notified on the basis of the procedures for notification of modification applications as contained in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, and the council’s notification policy for planning matters. The modifications to the conditions of consent are plainly procedural and do not affect the substance of the consent, merely changing the timeframe in which the deferred commencement conditions are to be met, and the timeframe within which the proposed conservation reserve is to be dedicated to the Minister.

4 By consent, the court makes the following orders,


      1. The appeal is upheld.

      2. That DA 249/10/2004 granted by the Court in proceedings No. 10530 of 2006 (“the Consent”) be modified as follows:
            (A) Condition A1 of Annexure A of the Consent be modified as follows:
                (i) Replace the reference to “2 years from the date of this consent” in A1(4) with 25 April 2010.
            (B) Condition A3 be deleted from the Conditions in Annexure A and a new Condition F13 be inserted as follows:

                    “Prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate, the Applicant shall dedicate to the Minister for Climate Change, Environment and Water a subdivided parcel of land identified as Lot B in Plan A39 at Attachment 3.

                    Note: Pursuant to s148 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act, 1974, the Minister for Climate Change, Environment and Water may acquire, by gift inter vivos, devise or bequest, any property for the purpose of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, and may agree to the condition of any such gift, devise or bequest.”

      3. Exhibit 1 (the Consent Order) is retained.

___________________

      T Bly
      Commissioner of the Court
      Ajl/ljr
Details
AGLC
K R Nash and Associates Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 [2009] NSWLEC 1387
Case
[2009] NSWLEC 1387
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of K R Nash & Associates Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the applicant, K R Nash & Associates Pty Ltd, sought modifications to a development consent previously granted for the subdivision and erection of tourist dwellings. The consent, initially granted in 2007, included deferred commencement conditions that had to be met before the consent could operate. The modifications sought related to the extension of time for providing evidence regarding the deferred commencement conditions and the re-scheduling of the dedication of a parcel of land to the Minister for Climate Change, Environment and Water. The respondent, the Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, did not oppose the modifications, leading to the presentation of consent orders.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proposed modifications to the consent were permissible under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (EP&A Regulation). Specifically, the court needed to determine if the modifications were procedural in nature and did not alter the substance of the original consent, as required by section 96(8) of the EP&A Act. Additionally, the court needed to consider if the modifications complied with the notification requirements set forth in the EP&A Regulation and the council's notification policy for planning matters.

The court found that the proposed modifications were procedural and did not affect the substance of the original consent. The changes merely extended the timeframe for fulfilling the deferred commencement conditions and adjusted the timing for dedicating the conservation reserve to the Minister. As the modifications did not require notification under the EP&A Regulation and the council's notification policy, the court upheld the modification application. The court then made orders to modify the development consent as per the consent orders provided by the parties. The consent was modified to extend the timeframe for providing evidence regarding the deferred commencement conditions and to require the dedication of the parcel of land prior to the issue of an occupation certificate. The court retained the original consent order, incorporating the modifications into the consent as per the agreement of the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.