Justin Doel v The Trustee for Albatross North Lakes Trust

Case [2023] FWC 3352


[2023] FWC 3352

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Justin Doel
v

The Trustee For Albatross North Lakes Trust

(U2023/10800)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 15 DECEMBER 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy

  1. On 4 November 2023, Mr Justin Doel (the Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. Mr Doel advised in his Form F2 – Unfair Dismissal Application (Form F2) that he commenced employment with The Trustee For Albatross North Lakes Trust (the Respondent) on 4 September 2023 and that his dismissal took effect on 14 October 2023.

  1. On 21 November 2023, the Commission attempted to contact Mr Doel on his nominated telephone number. Mr Doel did not answer the call and there was no facility to leave a voicemail message. Later that day, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Doel’s nominated email address advising him that, on the basis of the information provided in his Form F2, he had not served the minimum employment period. The correspondence directed Mr Doel to file any documents or other evidence to support his claim that he had served the required minimum employment period. That correspondence also warned him that if he did not contact the Commission within 14 days his application may be dismissed without further notice. An SMS notification was also sent to Mr Doel’s nominated telephone number requesting that he contact the Commission.

  1. On 24 November 2023, the Commission attempted to contact Mr Doel on his nominated telephone number. Mr Doel did not answer the call and there was no facility to leave a voicemail message. On 27 November 2023, as the required documentation was not received, the Commission attempted to contact Mr Doel on his nominated telephone number. However, Mr Doel did not answer the call and there was no facility to leave a voicemail message. To date, over 14 days have passed since the Commission’s initial correspondence to Mr Doel on 21 November 2023. Mr Doel has not replied to any of the Commission’s attempts to contact him.

  1. Section 382 of the FW Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if they have completed a period of employment. Section 383 of the FW Act sets out the minimum employment period as follows:

383 Meaning of minimum employment period

The minimum employment period is:

(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the earlier of the following times:

(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;

(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or

(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. As the material before the Commission indicates Mr Doel has not completed the required minimum employment period under the FW Act, I am satisfied the application has no reasonable prospect of success. As such, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act. An Order[1] to this effect will be issued with this decision.



DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] PR769419.         

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR769418>

Details
AGLC
Justin Doel v The Trustee for Albatross North Lakes Trust [2023] FWC 3352
Case
[2023] FWC 3352
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission, presided over by Deputy President Clancy, considered an application for unfair dismissal lodged by Mr Justin Doel against The Trustee for Albatross North Lakes Trust. Mr Doel claimed that he was dismissed on 14 October 2023, having commenced employment with the Respondent on 4 September 2023. The Commission was tasked with determining whether Mr Doel's dismissal was unfair and whether he had met the minimum employment period requirement under the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

The key legal issue for the Commission was whether Mr Doel had served the requisite minimum employment period, which is six months if the employer is not a small business employer. Section 394 of the FW Act protects employees from unfair dismissal if they meet the minimum employment period. Additionally, Section 587(1)(c) of the FW Act allows the Commission to dismiss an application if it has no reasonable prospect of success.

The Commission found that Mr Doel had not completed the minimum employment period of six months as stipulated by the FW Act. Despite multiple attempts to contact Mr Doel to request additional documentation, he did not respond to the Commission's communications. Based on the information provided, the Commission concluded that Mr Doel's application had no reasonable prospect of success. Consequently, the application was dismissed under Section 587(1)(c) of the FW Act.

An order will be issued with this decision, dismissing Mr Doel's application for unfair dismissal. The dismissal is based on the lack of evidence that Mr Doel had met the minimum employment period, leading to the conclusion that his application had no reasonable prospect of success.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.