Jurlina & Jurlina

In the matter of *Jurlina & Jurlina*, Aldridge J considered the property interests of the parties following their separation. The dispute concerned the division of their assets and liabilities, with the court tasked with determining an equitable distribution.

The primary legal issues before the court were the appropriate apportionment of the parties' financial and non-financial contributions to the marriage and the welfare of their children, both pre- and post-separation. The court was also required to consider whether any adjustments were warranted under section 75(2) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) to account for future needs.

Aldridge J found that the parties' financial and non-financial contributions up to the time of separation were equal. However, post-separation contributions necessitated a slight adjustment, resulting in a 51% to 49% split in favour of the wife. Further, the court determined that an adjustment of 7% in favour of the wife was appropriate under section 75(2) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), leading to a final division of 58% of the net assets to the wife and 42% to the husband. The orders detailed the specific assets and liabilities to be retained by each party, including the sale of certain properties and the distribution of proceeds.