[2013] FWCA 5101 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
JP Pipe & Steel Mackay Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1937)
JP PIPE & STEEL MACKAY PTY LTD QCLNG PROJECT UPSTREAM WORKS AGREEMENT
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 26 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the JP Pipe & Steel Mackay Pty Ltd QCLNG Project Upstream Works Agreement.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 12 July 2013 by JP Pipe & Steel Mackay Pty Ltd for the approval of a Greenfields agreement known as the JP Pipe & Steel Mackay Pty Ltd QCLNG Project Upstream Works Agreement(“the Agreement”).
[2] A statutory declaration was provided by Mr B. Devlin, Assistant State Secretary, of the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (“the AMWU”).
[3] In light of this statutory declaration and in accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the AMWU is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it and that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE402664 PR539442>
- AGLC
- JP Pipe and Steel Mackay Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 5101
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5101
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the terms of the agreement, the statutory requirements for pipeline construction, and the contractual obligations between the parties. It focused on whether the agreement provided sufficient protection for the parties involved and whether it aligned with the legislative framework governing such projects. The court also considered whether the agreement met the necessary standards for ensuring safety, environmental protection, and economic efficiency.
In its judgment, the court found that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and it met the statutory and contractual requirements. The court held that the agreement adequately protected the interests of the stakeholders and provided a clear framework for the construction of the pipeline. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, allowing the project to proceed. The final orders confirmed the approval of the agreement, paving the way for the construction to commence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.