| [2019] FWCA 3143 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
JP Contractors
(AG2019/1202)
JP CONTRACTORS AND AMWU METAL ENGINEERING ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 2017 - 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 8 MAY 2019 |
Application for approval of the JP Contractors and AMWU Metal Engineering On-Site Construction Agreement 2017 - 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the JP Contractors and AMWU Metal Engineering On-Site Construction Agreement 2017 - 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made by JP Contractors pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 May 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE503319 PR708062>
- AGLC
- JP Contractors [2019] FWCA 3143
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 3143
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court included whether the agreement met the requirements of section 235 of the Fair Work Act, particularly whether it was in the public interest to approve it. The Court had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and equitable terms for employees, and whether it complied with other provisions of the Fair Work Act, such as those relating to protected industrial action and minimum wage rates. The Court also needed to determine whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether the parties had genuinely attempted to negotiate in that spirit.
The Court found that the agreement was in the public interest and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. It concluded that the agreement provided fair and equitable terms for employees and complied with other relevant provisions of the Act. The Court also found that the agreement had been made in good faith and that the parties had genuinely attempted to negotiate in that spirit. Consequently, the Court approved the agreement, allowing it to be registered and enforced as a legally binding document.
The Court's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the agreement and the circumstances in which it was made. The Court considered the evidence presented by both parties and took into account the need to balance the interests of employees, employers, and the broader community. The Court's approval of the agreement provides certainty and stability for all parties involved and ensures that the terms and conditions of employment are fair and reasonable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.