| [2023] FWC 700 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Joseph Ciantar
v
SRG Global Products Pty Ltd
(U2023/1623)
| COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 23 MARCH 2023 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – unpaid application – dismissal at the Commission’s initiative under s.587.
On 25 February 2023 Mr Joseph Ciantar made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
The application was incomplete in that Mr Ciantar did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.
On 2 March 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Ciantar’s nominated email address advising that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment was not made or a waiver form was not received within 7 calendar days the application may be dismissed.
On 7 March 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Ciantar’s nominated email address reminding him that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment was not made or a waiver form was not received, the application may be dismissed.
A final attempt to contact Mr Ciantar on his nominated telephone number was made by the Commission on 15 March 2023 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered. A voicemail message was left advising Mr Ciantar that payment of the required fee was still outstanding.
To date there has been no response from Mr Ciantar, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.
Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:
395 Application fees
(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(2) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.
Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.
I am satisfied that, as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, I order that the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR760540>
- AGLC
- Joseph Ciantar v SRG Global Products Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 700
- Case
- [2023] FWC 700
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court needed to address were whether the application complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) and whether the application could be dismissed under section 587(1) of the FW Act. The court had to determine whether the application was made in accordance with the FW Act and whether there were grounds for dismissal as the application was not accompanied by the prescribed fee.
The court found that the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act as it was not accompanied by the required fee. The court noted that section 395 of the FW Act requires an application to be accompanied by a prescribed fee, and section 587(1) allows for the dismissal of an application if it is not made in accordance with the Act. The court was satisfied that the application did not meet the statutory requirements and ordered its dismissal under section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act.
The court dismissed Mr Ciantar's application for an unfair dismissal remedy due to its non-compliance with the requirements of the FW Act, specifically the failure to include the prescribed fee. The court made this decision under section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.