Jones v Trad (No 3)
Case
•
[2013] NSWCA 463
•18 December 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Jones v Trad (No 3) [2013] NSWCA 463
[2013] NSWCA 463
18 December 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In Jones v Trad (No 3), the appellants, having succeeded on only a limited number of grounds of appeal in a matter where the substantive case was not yet finally decided, sought orders regarding the costs of the appeal. The respondent also sought indemnity costs based on a rejected offer of settlement. The court was required to determine whether the costs of the appeal should follow the event, whether the failure to accept the settlement offer warranted a departure from the ordinary rule as to costs, and whether leave was required to address the issue of costs under s 119(1A) of the *Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997* (NSW).
The court reasoned that while the appellants had achieved some success, it was not a complete victory, and the substantive proceedings remained unresolved. Consequently, the ordinary rule that costs follow the event was applied, but with a modification to reflect the limited success. Regarding the offer of settlement, the court found that the circumstances did not justify an award of indemnity costs against the appellants. The court also determined that leave was not required to address the costs of the appeal under the relevant legislative provision.
The court ordered that the respondent pay the appellants' costs of the appeal on an ordinary basis, excluding the costs associated with the appellants' application for redaction of published reasons. Furthermore, the Appeal Panel's prior costs order of 18 March 2013 was set aside, and the question of costs for the Appeal Proceedings was remitted to the Appeal Panel for determination, taking into account the outcome of the appeal.
The court reasoned that while the appellants had achieved some success, it was not a complete victory, and the substantive proceedings remained unresolved. Consequently, the ordinary rule that costs follow the event was applied, but with a modification to reflect the limited success. Regarding the offer of settlement, the court found that the circumstances did not justify an award of indemnity costs against the appellants. The court also determined that leave was not required to address the costs of the appeal under the relevant legislative provision.
The court ordered that the respondent pay the appellants' costs of the appeal on an ordinary basis, excluding the costs associated with the appellants' application for redaction of published reasons. Furthermore, the Appeal Panel's prior costs order of 18 March 2013 was set aside, and the question of costs for the Appeal Proceedings was remitted to the Appeal Panel for determination, taking into account the outcome of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Jones v Trad (No 3) [2013] NSWCA 463
Most Recent Citation
Gagliardi v KP Hicks (No 2) [2018] VCC 1280
Cases Citing This Decision
23
Karam Group Pty Ltd ATF The Karam (No. 1) Family Trust v HCA Queensland Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2024] QSC 74
Sentinel Property Group Pty Ltd v ABH Hotel Pty Ltd
[2022] QSC 266
Gaynor v Burns
[2025] NSWSC 185
Cases Cited
20
Statutory Material Cited
4
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11
Latoudis v Casey
[1990] HCA 59
Targetts Pty Ltd v Target Australia Pty Ltd
[1993] FCA 259