Jones v The Queen
Case
•
[1988] HCATrans 200
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Jones v The Queen [1988] HCATrans 200
[1988] HCATrans 200
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerns an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia. The applicant, Jones, sought to appeal against a decision of the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, which had dismissed his appeal against a conviction for murder. The application was heard by Justices Wilson and Brennan.
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether to grant an extension of time for the applicant to file his special leave application. This was necessitated by a measure of delay in lodging the application, which the applicant's solicitor attributed to staffing issues within the public defender's chambers, a reason previously accepted by the Court in a related matter. The Court also considered the potential consequences should the special leave application succeed, specifically the possibility of substituting a verdict of manslaughter.
The Court acknowledged the importance of timely appeals, particularly in cases where a retrial might be ordered, for reasons of public interest. However, it also recognised the gravity of a murder conviction and the applicant's submission that the point of law was of considerable importance. The Court indicated it would reserve its decision on the extension of time and invited the applicant to proceed to the merits of the appeal. The factual background, as outlined by the applicant's counsel, involved an altercation at a hotel, the applicant leaving and returning with a rifle, and driving back to the hotel with another individual.
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether to grant an extension of time for the applicant to file his special leave application. This was necessitated by a measure of delay in lodging the application, which the applicant's solicitor attributed to staffing issues within the public defender's chambers, a reason previously accepted by the Court in a related matter. The Court also considered the potential consequences should the special leave application succeed, specifically the possibility of substituting a verdict of manslaughter.
The Court acknowledged the importance of timely appeals, particularly in cases where a retrial might be ordered, for reasons of public interest. However, it also recognised the gravity of a murder conviction and the applicant's submission that the point of law was of considerable importance. The Court indicated it would reserve its decision on the extension of time and invited the applicant to proceed to the merits of the appeal. The factual background, as outlined by the applicant's counsel, involved an altercation at a hotel, the applicant leaving and returning with a rifle, and driving back to the hotel with another individual.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Evidence
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Charge
-
Sentencing
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Jones v The Queen [1988] HCATrans 200
Cases Citing This Decision
0