Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jones v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1477 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 1 September 2017 Date of orders: 01 September 2017 Decision date: 01 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – additional level to townhouse - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Glen Jones (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Mr W Soon (Applicant)Solicitor:
Agent:
Mr M Bonanno, Inner West Council (Respondent)
Mr R Creighton, Australian Town Planning (Applicant)
File Number(s): 2017/233982 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal in respect of the property known as 3 Simmons St, Balmain or Lot 2 SP 11609, is upheld.
Development application with the Council’s reference D/2016/465 for the addition of a level to an existing townhouse is approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure “A” hereto.
……………………….
Commissioner Gray
233982.17 Gray (C) (329 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Jones v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1477
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1477
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful and whether the Council had exercised its discretion in accordance with the relevant statutory framework. In particular, the court had to determine whether the Council's decision was based on irrelevant considerations, failed to take into account relevant considerations, or was otherwise irrational. Additionally, the court examined whether the Council had provided adequate reasons for its decision, as required by statute.
The court found that the Council's decision to refuse the development application was indeed unlawful. The decision was based on irrelevant considerations and failed to take into account several relevant factors. The Council had not provided adequate reasons for its decision, which was insufficient under the statutory requirements. The court concluded that the Council's decision was arbitrary and capricious, and therefore, the plaintiff's application for judicial review was successful. The court ordered that the Council's decision be quashed and remitted to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the law. Furthermore, the court ordered that the Council pay the plaintiff's costs of the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.