Jones v Evans

Case [2006] FCA 320


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Jones v Evans [2006] FCA 320

JEREMY JONES v RODNEY ANDREW EVANS

NSD 855 OF 2005

EMMETT J
6 FEBRUARY 2006
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD855 OF 2005

BETWEEN:

JEREMY JONES
APPLICANT

AND:

RODNEY ANDREW EVANS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

6 FEBRUARY 2006

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Grants leave to the applicant to file an amended application substituting Rodney Andrew Evans, the editor and publisher of The Nation, as Respondent.

2.Declares that the Respondent has engaged in conduct rendered unlawful by Part IIA Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act by having published or allowing to the published in ‘The Nation – The Official Newspaper of One Nation’ Volume 4, Edition 10:

(i)a cartoon on page 3, and

(ii)an article accompanying the said cartoon headed ‘Kiddie porn to be used as net censorship ploy’,

being material which is offensive, insulting, humiliating and intimidating to Jewish people (‘the Material’).

3.Orders that the Respondent be restrained from publishing or republishing to the public by itself or by any agent or employee:

(iii)The Material or any part thereof;

(iv)Any material with a substantially similar content to the Material.

4.Orders that the Respondent forthwith deliver to the Applicant, Jeremy Jones, a written statement of apology, signed by the Respondent, in the following terms:

‘Mr Rodney Andrew Evans hereby unreservedly and unconditionally apologises to you and to the Australian Jewish community for having published material in contravention of the Racial Discrimination Act. I undertake that I will not publish any such material in the future and that all such material which is presently published by The Nation, in any print or electronic media (including the Internet) will forthwith be withdrawn from publication.’

Note:   Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD855 OF 2005

BETWEEN:

JEREMY JONES

APPLICANT

AND:

RODNEY ANDREW EVANS

RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE:

6 FEBRUARY 2006

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. When the matter was called on for hearing this morning, Mr Noel Evans indicated that he wished to appear for the respondent, which is referred to in the application as ‘One Nation as publisher of The Nation’.  There is some doubt in my mind as to the standing of One Nation.  Mr Evans indicated that One Nation is an unincorporated association and that it does not have any legal assistance, either as a consequence of any legislation relating to elections or otherwise.  In those circumstances, the applicant sought leave to amend the application by the substitution of Mr Noel Evans as the respondent Mr Evans accepts that he is the publisher of the journal which is the subject of the complaint.

  2. In the circumstances, I consider that it is appropriate to give leave to amend entitlement of the proceeding by the substitution of Mr Rodney Andrew Evans as the respondent.

  3. I make orders in accordance with draft short minutes as amended which I have initialled, dated with today’s date and placed with the papers.

I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.

Associate:

Dated:            31 March 2006

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R. Goot SC and Mr S. Blount
Solicitors for the Applicant: Denes Ebner
The Respondent appeared in person
Date of Hearing: 6 February 2006
Date of Judgment: 6 February 2006
Details
AGLC
Jones v Evans [2006] FCA 320
Case
[2006] FCA 320
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Federal Court involved a legal dispute between Jeremy Jones, the President of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, and Rodney Andrew Evans, who was the editor and publisher of The Nation, a newspaper associated with the political party One Nation. The applicant, Mr Jones, sought relief from alleged breaches of the Racial Discrimination Act by the publication of offensive content targeting Jewish people. The court was tasked with determining whether the material published in The Nation constituted a breach of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits offensive, insulting, humiliating, or intimidating behaviour based on race.

The legal issues at the heart of this case centred on the interpretation and application of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Specifically, the court had to assess whether the content published in The Nation constituted racial discrimination, as defined by the Act. The court also needed to consider the scope of the prohibitions in section 18C and whether the conduct of the Respondent constituted an unlawful publication under the Act. Furthermore, the court had to determine the appropriate remedies to be awarded if the Applicant's claims were upheld.

The Federal Court found that the content published in The Nation did indeed contravene section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. The Court held that the cartoon and accompanying article were offensive, insulting, humiliating, and intimidating to Jewish people, constituting racial discrimination. The Court also concluded that the content was published with the knowledge and approval of the Respondent. In response to the Applicant's claims, the Court ordered the Respondent to cease publishing the material and to deliver a formal apology to the Applicant and the broader Jewish community. The Court further granted the Applicant leave to amend the application to substitute the Respondent, ensuring that the legal proceedings accurately reflected the current editor and publisher of The Nation.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Grants leave to the applicant to file an amended application substituting Rodney Andrew Evans, the editor and publisher of The Nation, as Respondent.

2. Declares that the Respondent has engaged in conduct rendered unlawful by Part IIA Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act by having published or allowing to the published in ‘The Nation – The Official Newspaper of One Nation’ Volume 4, Edition 10:

(i) a cartoon on page 3, and

(ii) an article accompanying the said cartoon headed ‘Kiddie porn to be used as net censorship ploy’,

being material which is offensive, insulting, humiliating and intimidating to Jewish people (‘the Material’).

3. Orders that the Respondent be restrained from publishing or republishing to the public by itself or by any agent or employee:

(iii) The Material or any part thereof;

(iv) Any material with a substantially similar content to the Material.

4. Orders that the Respondent forthwith deliver to the Applicant, Jeremy Jones, a written statement of apology, signed by the Respondent, in the following terms:

‘Mr Rodney Andrew Evans hereby unreservedly and unconditionally apologises to you and to the Australian Jewish community for having published material in contravention of the Racial Discrimination Act. I undertake that I will not publish any such material in the future and that all such material which is presently published by The Nation, in any print or electronic media (including the Internet) will forthwith be withdrawn from publication.’

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

EMMETT J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: EMMETT J

Full text does not contain this section.