Johnson v Calvo (No 2)
Case
•
[2016] NSWCA 75
•11 April 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Johnson v Calvo (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 75
[2016] NSWCA 75
11 April 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Johnson v Calvo (No 2)*, Ms Johnson applied to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales to vacate a hearing date. The respondent was Ellimark.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether Ms Johnson had demonstrated a sound basis for vacating the scheduled hearing.
Leeming JA dismissed the application, finding that no sound basis had been demonstrated to justify vacating the hearing. The court applied the principle that applications to vacate hearing dates require a substantial and compelling reason, which was not established in this instance.
Consequently, Ms Johnson's notice of motion was dismissed, and she was ordered to pay Ellimark's costs of and occasioned by the motion.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether Ms Johnson had demonstrated a sound basis for vacating the scheduled hearing.
Leeming JA dismissed the application, finding that no sound basis had been demonstrated to justify vacating the hearing. The court applied the principle that applications to vacate hearing dates require a substantial and compelling reason, which was not established in this instance.
Consequently, Ms Johnson's notice of motion was dismissed, and she was ordered to pay Ellimark's costs of and occasioned by the motion.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Johnson v Calvo (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 75
Cases Citing This Decision
0