| [2022] FWCA 360 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Johnson Stenner Aged Care Pty Ltd
(AG2021/8708)
JOHNSON STENNER AGED CARE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Aged care industry | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 7 FEBRUARY 2022 |
Application for approval of the Johnson Stenner Aged Care Enterprise Agreement 2021
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Johnson Stenner Aged Care Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Johnson Stenner Aged Care Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Noting clause 6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES in the Act will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[5] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the ANMF.
[6] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE514845 PR738082>
- AGLC
- Johnson Stenner Aged Care Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 360
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 360
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement contained the necessary 'protected action provisions' and whether it was 'freely' and 'voluntarily' made. The union argued that the agreement did not adequately protect employees’ rights and did not reflect a genuine consensus among the parties.
The Fair Work Commission, after reviewing the evidence and submissions, concluded that the proposed agreement was made freely and voluntarily and contained the necessary protected action provisions. The Commission found that the agreement appropriately balanced the rights and obligations of both parties and provided adequate protections for employees. Accordingly, the Commission approved the Johnson Stenner Aged Care Enterprise Agreement 2021.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.