| [2017] FWCA 1468 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
John L Pierce Pty Ltd T/A John L Pierce Pty Ltd
(AG2016/7556)
JOHN L PIERCE PETROLEUM DIVISION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 15 MARCH 2017 |
Application for approval of the John L Pierce Petroleum Division Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the John L Pierce Petroleum Division Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by John L Pierce Pty Ltd T/A John L Pierce Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 15 March 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 22 March 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 March 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE423664 PR590985>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- John L Pierce Pty Ltd T/A John L Pierce Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 1468
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1468
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was made in accordance with the procedural requirements of the Act, and whether it provided for the terms and conditions of employment of the relevant employees. The Commission noted that the agreement had been the subject of a series of negotiations between the employer and the union, and that a majority of eligible employees had voted in favour of the agreement in a ballot. However, the union argued that the agreement did not adequately address certain issues, including the classification of employees and the calculation of overtime.
In considering these issues, the Commission noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that the procedural requirements of the Act had been followed. The Commission also noted that the agreement provided for the terms and conditions of employment of the relevant employees, including their classification and the calculation of overtime. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the requirements of the Act, and therefore approved it. The union's application to contest the agreement was dismissed.
The Fair Work Commission approved the John L Pierce Petroleum Division Enterprise Agreement 2016, and dismissed the union's application to contest the agreement. The Commission found that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith, and that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement provides for the terms and conditions of employment of the relevant employees, including their classification and the calculation of overtime. The union's concerns about certain aspects of the agreement were not sufficient to prevent its approval.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.