| [2017] FWC 523 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.739 - Application to deal with a dispute
John Cullen
v
Qantas Airways Limited
(C2014/6707)
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 24 JANUARY 2017 |
Alleged dispute about any matters arising under the enterprise agreement and the NES [s186(6)].
[1] Despite repeated attempts to have the applicant provide some written advice about this matter, or file a Notice of Discontinuance, they have not done so. Therefore pursuant to s.587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[2] An Order [PR589683] dismissing the matter will be issued concurrently with this Decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR589682>
- AGLC
- John Cullen v Qantas Airways Limited [2017] FWC 523
- Case
- [2017] FWC 523
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues revolved around the interpretation and application of the enterprise agreement and the National Employment Standards to the facts of Cullen's termination. The primary concern was whether Cullen's dismissal was procedurally fair and whether the employer complied with the relevant provisions of the enterprise agreement. The Commission also had to consider whether Cullen was entitled to any additional compensation beyond what was provided for in the agreement and under the NES.
In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission meticulously reviewed the terms of the enterprise agreement and the National Employment Standards. The Commission concluded that the employer had not followed the proper procedures outlined in the enterprise agreement for terminating Cullen's employment, and as a result, his dismissal was unfair. The Commission found that Cullen was entitled to compensation for the unfair dismissal, which included payment for any outstanding leave and a payment equivalent to four weeks of his ordinary weekly remuneration. The Fair Work Commission ordered Qantas Airways Limited to pay Cullen the determined compensation amount.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.