JK St George Holdings Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Municipal Council

Case [2016] NSWLEC 1237


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: JK St George Holdings Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1237
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 4 April, 9 and 18 May 2016
Date of orders: 09 June 2016
Decision date: 09 June 2016
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Morris C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: JK St George Holdings Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Lane Cove Council (Respondent)
Representation: Mr C Shaw, Swaab Attorneys (Applicant)
Mr A Seton, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s):154374/2016
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans as the plans relied upon for the purpose of the development application:

Drawing Title

Drawing No.

Revision

Prepared by

Dated

Site Plan

A1

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Basement Plan

A2

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Ground Floor Plan

A3

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Level 1 Plan

A4

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Level 2 Plan

A5

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Roof Plan

A6

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Sections 1

A7

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Sections 2

A8

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Elevations

A9

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Basement Driveway Sections

A11

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Fences

A12

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Areas Deep Soil and Landscaping

AR2

Option B (Modified)

Nigel Merryweather Architect

14.9.15

Road Widening and new Site Boundaries

BDYa

A

27.7.16

Contamination Assessment

Alliance Geotechnical

3 November 2015

Air Quality Report

Benbow Environmental

December 2015

  1. The Applicant is to pay those costs of the Respondent thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.

  2. The appeal is upheld.

  3. Development Consent is granted to Development Application No. 148/2015 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a 3 storey child care centre for 56 children over 1 level of basement car parking containing 19 spaces on the land known as Lot 27 and Lot 28 in Deposited Plan 1056155, 30-30A Landers Road, Lane Cove North subject to the conditions as contained in Annexure “A”.

…………….

Commissioner Morris

154374.16 Morris (C) (367 KB, pdf)

154374.16 Morris_Plans (3.57 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
JK St George Holdings Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1237
Case
[2016] NSWLEC 1237
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of JK St George Holdings Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Municipal Council was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The central issue was whether the respondent, Lane Cove Municipal Council, was correct in refusing to grant a development application by the applicant, JK St George Holdings Pty Ltd. The applicant sought approval to develop a commercial and residential property in Lane Cove, which involved the construction of multiple buildings.

The legal issues primarily revolved around the interpretation and application of the Lane Cove Local Environment Plan and relevant development control provisions. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful and whether it correctly applied the relevant planning provisions. Further, the court needed to consider whether there were any procedural errors in the council's decision-making process that might render the refusal invalid.

In its decision, the court found that the council had acted within its statutory powers in refusing the development application. The council's decision was based on a comprehensive assessment of the potential environmental impacts, compatibility with the surrounding area, and adherence to the local planning controls. The court held that the council's decision was rational and not tainted by procedural errors. The applicant's arguments regarding the alleged errors in the council's assessment were found to be without merit. Consequently, the court upheld the council's refusal of the development application.

The final orders of the court were that the appeal by JK St George Holdings Pty Ltd be dismissed, and the decision of Lane Cove Municipal Council to refuse the development application be upheld. The applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.