| [2024] FWC 1882 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.365—General protections
Jianing Wang
v
Iconic Hotels Management Unit Trust and another
(C2024/3875)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 18 JULY 2024 |
Section 365 – jurisdictional objection dismissed
Jianing Wang (applicant) made an application under s 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). Iconic Hotels Management Unit Trust (respondent) objected to the application on the basis that it did not dismiss the applicant. At the jurisdictional hearing earlier today, I explained to the parties that it was very clear that the respondent had dismissed the applicant, and the respondent accepted that this was the case. The jurisdictional objection was dismissed. I then proceeded to deal with the matter as required by s 368. The Commission’s function in relation to this application has now concluded.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Hearing details:
2024
Melbourne
18 July
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR777122>
- AGLC
- Jianing Wang v Iconic Hotels Management Unit Trust [2024] FWC 1882
- Case
- [2024] FWC 1882
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the respondent had, in fact, dismissed the applicant, as was claimed. This was crucial to determine the court's jurisdiction over the matter. During the jurisdictional hearing, Deputy President Colman clarified to both parties that it was evident from the evidence presented that the respondent had indeed dismissed the applicant. Upon this clarification, the respondent conceded that the dismissal had occurred.
Given the respondent's acceptance of the dismissal, the jurisdictional objection was dismissed, and the matter proceeded under section 368 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission's role in this specific application was thus concluded with this decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.