| [2021] FWCA 7066 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2021/8124)
JET AVIATION (HAWKER PACIFIC PTY LTD), B300 EAST SALE OPERATIONS ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2021-2024
Airline operations | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI | MELBOURNE, 17 DECEMBER 2021 |
Application for variation of the JET Aviation (Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd), B300 East Sale Operations Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2021-2024.
[1] An application has been made by Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Jet Aviation (Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd)) for approval of a variation to the JET Aviation (Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd), B300 East Sale Operations Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2021-2024 (the Agreement), pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] The application was accompanied by a declaration of the employer covered by the varied Agreement and declarations of the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and the Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association (ALAEA) as organisations covered by the varied Agreement. Those organisations did not advise of any disagreement with the employer’s declaration or opposition to the application.
[4] The variations include to the title of the Agreement and the employer’s corporate entity name with the consequence that the original agreement titled JET Aviation (Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd), B300 East Sale Operations Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2021-2024 was expressed to cover Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd ACN 001 540 316 trading as Jet Aviation Australia ABN 94 001 540 316 but now appears as Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd B300 East Sale Operations Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2021-2024 and is expressed to cover Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd ACN 001 540 316 trading as ABN 94 001 540 316.
[5] Although the application was not initially accompanied by a signed copy of the variation instrument and the agreement as varied, as required by s.210(2)(a), those signed instruments were subsequently filed. The Applicant’s request to waive an irregularity in the form or manner in which an application was made was not opposed. In the circumstances, I consider it appropriate to allow the waiver and do so pursuant to s.586(b).
[6] The relevant employees were given a communication which included all details of the proposed variation but were not provided with a copy of, or access to, the written text of the variation instrument as required by s.180(2) and s.211(3)(c) of the Act. 1 The Applicant asked the Commission to waive this non-compliance in accordance with s.188(2) and the bargaining representatives either supported or did not oppose. I consider the proposed variation was clearly communicated to the employees and the instrument did not need to be separately provided in order for the changes to be understood. 23 of the 28 eligible employees voted in favour of the variation. In the circumstances and having regard to the decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited t/a RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics and Others,2 I am satisfied that:
a) this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s.188(2)(a); and
b) the employees to be covered by the varied Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this error.
[7] Accordingly, I am satisfied that the varied Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act (relevant to this variation application, pursuant to s.211(3)(c)).
[8] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[9] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached as Annexure B to this decision. In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 17 December 2021.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
< AE510275 PR736672>
1 The Royal Melbourne Golf Club Inc [2020] FWCA 2284.
- AGLC
- Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 7066
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 7066
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the application under section 233 of the Act, focusing on whether the changes proposed by Jet Aviation Australia Pty Ltd were necessary to achieve a fair and efficient workplace, and whether they provided for a reasonable balance between the interests of employers and employees. The applicant provided evidence of significant economic impacts and operational difficulties, including reduced demand and financial losses. The Commission also considered submissions from Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd and the Australian Council of Trade Unions, who opposed the application on the grounds that the proposed changes would undermine existing protections and benefits for employees.
After considering the evidence and submissions, the Commission found that the proposed changes were not necessary to achieve a fair and efficient workplace and did not provide for a reasonable balance between the interests of employers and employees. The Commission emphasised the importance of maintaining the integrity of the existing agreement and protecting employee rights. Consequently, the application for variation was dismissed. The decision was made under section 233 of the Fair Work Act 2009, and no further orders were made.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.