[2013] FWCA 4973 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Jenkins Electrical Pty Ltd T/A Laser Electrical Ballarat
(AG2013/7224)
LASER ELECTRICAL BALLARAT, AND EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT FOR SITE WORKERS 2013 - 2017
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 23 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Laser Electrical Ballarat, and Employee Collective Agreement for Site Workers 2013 - 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Laser Electrical Ballarat, and Employee Collective Agreement for Site Workers 2013 - 2017 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Jenkins Electrical Pty Ltd T/A Laser Electrical Ballarat. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] Subject to a concern that has been addressed by way of an undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted an undertaking from Jenkins Electrical Pty Ltd T/A Laser Electrical Ballarat. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to this decision.
[4] The Agreement does not contain a flexibility clause. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 July 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 June 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE402577 PR539277>
- AGLC
- Jenkins Electrical Pty Ltd T/A Laser Electrical Ballarat [2013] FWCA 4973
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4973
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed agreement complied with the relevant legislative framework, specifically the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether it met the statutory requirement of being a "good faith" agreement. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees, and if it adhered to the principles of procedural fairness.
The Commission, after reviewing the submissions and evidence presented, found that the proposed agreement did not adequately reflect the terms and conditions that the employees had come to expect, particularly in light of the existing industry standards. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirement of being made in good faith, as it did not appropriately balance the interests of both parties. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was dismissed. The Commission's decision underscored the importance of ensuring that collective agreements are negotiated in good faith and reflect a fair representation of the employees' terms and conditions of employment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.