Jeeves and Jeeves
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 855
•12 August 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Jeeves and Jeeves [2009] FamCA 855
[2009] FamCA 855
12 August 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties in this matter were Mr and Mrs Jeeves, and the dispute concerned an application for the Honourable Justice Cronin to stand aside from hearing the case. The application was made to the Supreme Court of Victoria.
The sole legal issue before the Court was whether there were grounds for Justice Cronin to recuse himself from presiding over the proceedings.
Justice Cronin dismissed the oral application, finding no basis to stand aside. The Court applied the well-established legal principles concerning apprehended bias, which require a judge to recuse themselves if a fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial mind to the resolution of the question the judge is to decide. In this instance, the Court found that no such apprehension of bias could reasonably be formed.
The oral application that the judge stand aside was dismissed.
The sole legal issue before the Court was whether there were grounds for Justice Cronin to recuse himself from presiding over the proceedings.
Justice Cronin dismissed the oral application, finding no basis to stand aside. The Court applied the well-established legal principles concerning apprehended bias, which require a judge to recuse themselves if a fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial mind to the resolution of the question the judge is to decide. In this instance, the Court found that no such apprehension of bias could reasonably be formed.
The oral application that the judge stand aside was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Jeeves and Jeeves [2009] FamCA 855
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
Johnson v Johnson
[2000] HCA 48
Wirth v Wirth
[1956] HCA 71
Claudia Jean Laurie v Amaca Pty Ltd and others
[2009] NSWDDT 14