Jean Elliott v Glenda Rae Pickard
Case
•
[2000] QSC 298
•4 September 2000
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Jean Elliott v Glenda Rae Pickard [2000] QSC 298
[2000] QSC 298
4 September 2000
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Jean Elliott commenced proceedings against Glenda Rae Pickard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The applicant, Jean Elliott, sought compensation for injuries sustained during an incident where the respondent, Glenda Rae Pickard, was convicted of attempted murder. The applicant’s claim was made under the provisions of the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995, which provides for compensation to victims of serious crimes. The central issue before the court was whether the applicant was entitled to compensation and, if so, the amount that should be awarded under the statutory compensation scheme.
The court was required to determine the eligibility of the applicant for compensation under the Act, considering the severity of the crime and the extent of the injuries sustained. Additionally, the court had to assess the compensation payable according to the statutory guidelines, taking into account factors such as the impact of the crime on the applicant's physical and psychological well-being, loss of income, and any medical expenses incurred. The court examined the statutory provisions and relevant case law to evaluate these factors comprehensively.
In its judgment, the court found that the applicant was indeed entitled to compensation. The court determined that the injuries suffered were severe and had a significant impact on the applicant's life. After considering all relevant factors, the court awarded the applicant $22,500 in compensation. The court concluded that this amount appropriately reflected the harm suffered and was consistent with the statutory guidelines for compensation in similar cases.
The court was required to determine the eligibility of the applicant for compensation under the Act, considering the severity of the crime and the extent of the injuries sustained. Additionally, the court had to assess the compensation payable according to the statutory guidelines, taking into account factors such as the impact of the crime on the applicant's physical and psychological well-being, loss of income, and any medical expenses incurred. The court examined the statutory provisions and relevant case law to evaluate these factors comprehensively.
In its judgment, the court found that the applicant was indeed entitled to compensation. The court determined that the injuries suffered were severe and had a significant impact on the applicant's life. After considering all relevant factors, the court awarded the applicant $22,500 in compensation. The court concluded that this amount appropriately reflected the harm suffered and was consistent with the statutory guidelines for compensation in similar cases.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Compensation Orders
-
Criminal Liability
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
CEO Department of Main Roads v Club Cavill P/L (ACN 099 023 711) [2011] QPEC 15
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1