Jayke Steven Fleury v The Queen
Case
•
[2008] ACTCA 20
•11 November 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Jayke Steven Fleury v The Queen [2008] ACTCA 20
[2008] ACTCA 20
11 November 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Jayke Steven Fleury appealed against a sentence imposed by Gray J in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The specific nature of the criminal offence for which the sentence was imposed is not detailed in the provided text.
The central legal issue before the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania was whether the sentence handed down by Gray J was appropriate and should be upheld on appeal. This involved a review of the sentencing decision in light of relevant sentencing principles and the circumstances of the offence.
The Full Court, comprising Higgins CJ, Penfold and Marshall JJ, ultimately dismissed the appeal. Their Honours confirmed the sentence imposed by Gray J and ordered that the sentence and the non-parole period were to commence on 17 April 2007.
The central legal issue before the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania was whether the sentence handed down by Gray J was appropriate and should be upheld on appeal. This involved a review of the sentencing decision in light of relevant sentencing principles and the circumstances of the offence.
The Full Court, comprising Higgins CJ, Penfold and Marshall JJ, ultimately dismissed the appeal. Their Honours confirmed the sentence imposed by Gray J and ordered that the sentence and the non-parole period were to commence on 17 April 2007.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Evidence
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Sentencing
-
Charge
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0