JARMIN & ELSTONE (No.4)

The case of *Jarmin & Elstone (No.4)* concerned a dispute between Jarmin and Elstone, with Young J presiding in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but it involved a legal matter brought before the court for determination.

The central legal issue before Young J was the interpretation and application of certain legal principles relevant to the case. While the specific legal questions are not explicitly enumerated, the judgment would have addressed the rights and obligations of the parties in relation to the subject matter of their dispute.

Young J's reasoning and the legal principles applied would have been based on established Australian common law and any relevant statutory provisions. The judgment would have involved an analysis of the evidence presented and the application of legal tests to reach a conclusion on the matters in dispute. The outcome of the case would have been the pronouncement of orders by the court, resolving the dispute between Jarmin and Elstone.