Janko and Janko (No. 2)

In *Janko and Janko (No. 2)*, heard before Macmillan J, the husband sought to have paragraph 3 of his Response to an Application in a Case, filed on 1 May 2018, dismissed and removed from the list of cases awaiting hearing.

The central legal issue before the court was whether paragraph 3 of the husband's Response was a proper or necessary pleading in the context of the proceedings.

Macmillan J determined that paragraph 3 of the husband's Response was not a proper or necessary pleading. The court reasoned that the content of that paragraph was not relevant to the issues that required determination in the case. Consequently, the court ordered that paragraph 3 of the husband's Response be dismissed and removed from the list of cases awaiting hearing.