| [2023] FWC 2639 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Jake Reeves
v
The Scout Association Of Australia, South Australian Branch Incorporated
(U2023/7561)
| COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 12 OCTOBER 2023 |
Application for relief from unfair dismissal – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative
On 14 August 2023 Jake Reeves (the Applicant) made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
The Form F2 Unfair Dismissal application filed by the Applicant was incomplete in that he did not provide the date his dismissal took effect.
On 18 August 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to the Applicant’s nominated email address requesting that he provide further information as no effective date of dismissal was provided in the application. This correspondence also advised that if no further information was provided within 14 days, the application may be dismissed.
On 22 August 2023 the Commission attempted to contact the Applicant on his nominated telephone number to request the missing details. However, the nominated telephone number provided in the Form F2 was incomplete in that it was one digit short of a valid telephone number.
As no further information was received, on 5 September 2023, the Commission emailed correspondence to the Applicant’s nominated email address referring to the correspondence sent by the Commission on 18 August 2023 and advising that no response had been received from the Applicant. This correspondence also advised that if no further correspondence was provided by close of business 6 September 2023, the application may be dismissed.
The matter was subsequently referred to me to determine.
On 28 September 2023 my Chambers sent correspondence to the Applicant. This correspondence advised that I was considering dismissing the application given the Applicant’s failure to respond to the Commission’s correspondence. This correspondence requested that the Applicant advise by 4 October 2023 of an approximate date as to when the Applicant commenced working for The Scout Association Of Australia, South Australian Branch Incorporated and when the Applicant’s hours were cut. The Applicant was further advised that a failure to reply to this correspondence may result in his application being dismissed without further correspondence.
To date, the Applicant has not provided any further correspondence to the Commission.
Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.
Section 587 does not limit the circumstances in which the Commission can consider dismissing an application. In this matter, I consider it appropriate to exercise my discretion to dismiss the application in accordance with s.587(1) of the FW Act. I do so as the Applicant has failed to engage with the Commission in relation to the finalisation of his application, and I do not consider that he will do so in the future. The application is therefore dismissed.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR767108>
- AGLC
- Jake Reeves v The Scout Association of Australia, South Australian Branch Incorporated [2023] FWC 2639
- Case
- [2023] FWC 2639
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commissioner found that the Applicant's failure to respond to the Commission's requests for information constituted a lack of engagement and cooperation. The Commission had attempted to contact the Applicant multiple times, both via email and phone, but received no response. The Commissioner concluded that the Applicant's lack of engagement indicated that the application would not proceed effectively and had no reasonable prospect of success. Furthermore, the Commissioner noted that the application was not made in accordance with the Act due to the incomplete information provided. Under Section 587(1) of the FW Act, the Commissioner had the discretion to dismiss the application, and it was deemed appropriate to do so given the circumstances.
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the application for unfair dismissal under Section 587(1) of the FW Act. The dismissal was based on the Applicant's failure to engage with the Commission and provide the necessary information to progress the application. The Commissioner found that the application was not made in accordance with the Act, was frivolous or vexatious, and had no reasonable prospect of success due to the Applicant's lack of response and engagement. Consequently, the application was dismissed without further consideration.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.