Jackson v Jackson

The Full Court of the Family Court of Australia heard an appeal concerning property adjustment orders made in a de facto relationship. The appellant, Mr Jackson, sought to challenge the orders made by a Master of the Court.

The primary legal issue before the Full Court was whether the amount awarded by the Master for the adjustment of property was justifiable under the *De Facto Relationships Act 1984* (NSW).

The Full Court found that the Master's decision was clearly justifiable. The Court applied the principles governing property adjustment in de facto relationships, considering the evidence before the Master and the relevant provisions of the Act. The Court was satisfied that the Master had properly exercised their discretion and that the orders made were appropriate in the circumstances.

The appeal was dismissed with costs.