Jackie-Serena Mills v Australian National Drag Racing Association Ltd

Case [2023] FWC 924


[2023] FWC 924

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Jackie-Serena Mills
v

Australian National Drag Racing Association Ltd

(U2023/2183)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT O’NEILL

MELBOURNE, 20 APRIL 2023

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy

  1. On 17 March 2023 Ms Jackie-Serena Mills made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

  1. The application was incomplete in that Ms Mills did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.

  1. On 20 March 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to Ms Mills’ nominated email address advising that her application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if she wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received within 7 calendar days the application may be dismissed.

  1. On 21 March 2023 an SMS notification was sent to Ms Mills’ nominated telephone number advising her of the requirement to action the payment request email from the Fair Work Commission.

  1. On 4 April 2023 the Commission again emailed correspondence to Ms Mills’ nominated email address reminding that her application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if she wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received, the application may be dismissed.

  1. A final attempt to contact Ms Mills on her nominated telephone number was made by the Commission on 14 April 2023 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered. A voicemail message was left advising Ms Mills that payment of the required fee was still outstanding.

  1. To date there has been no response from Ms Mills, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.

  1. Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:

395 Application fees

(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.

(2) The regulations may prescribe:

(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and

(b) a method for indexing the fee; and

(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.

  1. Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. I am satisfied that, as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR761214>

Details
AGLC
Jackie-Serena Mills v Australian National Drag Racing Association Ltd [2023] FWC 924
Case
[2023] FWC 924
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Jackie-Serena Mills filed an application for an unfair dismissal remedy with the Fair Work Commission against the Australian National Drag Racing Association Ltd. The application was incomplete as Ms Mills did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form. Multiple attempts were made by the Fair Work Commission to contact Ms Mills to rectify the omission, but there was no response. The Commission ultimately dismissed the application for non-compliance with the Fair Work Act. The central issue for the Fair Work Commission was whether the application complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, specifically in relation to the payment of the application fee or the submission of a completed waiver form.

The Fair Work Commission considered the provisions of the Fair Work Act and determined that the application was not made in accordance with the Act, as required by section 587(1)(a). The Deputy President found that the application was incomplete and thus not compliant with the Act. The Commission had made several attempts to contact Ms Mills to advise her of the requirement to pay the fee or submit a waiver form, but there was no response from Ms Mills. The Deputy President concluded that the application should be dismissed because it did not meet the requirements of the Act.

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the application for unfair dismissal brought by Jackie-Serena Mills against the Australian National Drag Racing Association Ltd. The dismissal was due to the application not being made in accordance with the Fair Work Act, as it did not include the required fee or a completed waiver form. The Commission had made several attempts to contact Ms Mills to rectify the omission, but there was no response. As a result, the application was dismissed pursuant to section 587(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act. The final orders of the Fair Work Commission were that the application be dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.