| [2016] FWCA 8629 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty
J & S Engineering & Maintenance Pty Limited
(AG2016/7288)
J & S ENGINEERING & MAINTENANCE PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 2 DECEMBER 2016 |
Application for variation of the J & S Engineering & Maintenance Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation of the J & S Engineering & Maintenance Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by J & S Engineering & Maintenance Pty Limited.
[2] The application seeks to vary the Agreement as follows:
1. By deleting Table 2 “Trades Assistants Rates of Pay” on page 9 of the Agreement and inserting the following:
“Table 2
Trades Assistants Rates of Pay
On Commencement | 01/07/2013 | |
Trades Assist | ||
● Level 1 | 85% of Senior Tradesman | 72% of Tradesman |
● Level 2 | 90.028% of Senior Tradesman | 85% of Tradesman |
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.211 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The application is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, incorporating the variation is attached.
[5] The variation operates from1 December 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE420543 PR588105>
- AGLC
- J & S Engineering & Maintenance Pty Limited [2016] FWCA 8629
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 8629
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed changes were in the interests of the employees and whether the application satisfied the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission had to assess the justification provided by the company for the changes, the impact of the proposed changes on employees, and whether the company had engaged in good faith bargaining with the employees' representatives.
The Fair Work Commission found that the company had demonstrated a legitimate business need for the proposed changes, which were intended to enhance operational efficiency and respond to changes in the business environment. The Commission also found that the company had engaged in good faith bargaining with the employees' representatives, and that the proposed changes were not likely to have a detrimental impact on the employees' working conditions. Accordingly, the Commission accepted the application and varied the Enterprise Agreement as sought by the company.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the Enterprise Agreement be varied as per the company's application, with the changes to take effect from a specified date. The employees' representatives were given the opportunity to appeal the decision, but no appeal was lodged within the prescribed time frame.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.